An article on Outlook India, And Now a Fatwa to
Justify Protests Against Rushdie, criticises the view of the clerics who
said that the Muslims have right to protest with the limits of the law. The article
quotes Maulana Khalid Rashid Farangimahal saying: "All Muslims, without
flouting the law should oppose through every possible means, the visit of the
person who used insulting words against the prophet so that he cannot set his
foot in this country where crores of Muslims live."
If this is a fatwa, this fatwa was issued
by the lawmakers of India when they gave Indian citizens right to express their
opinion through democratic means. It was a fair thing that Salman Rushdie was
not disallowed from entering India because he holds a PIO card, and he has
previously visited India on this basis, but it is also fair that if certain
people want to protest his visit, there should not be any decry over it.
Anyway, Indian leaders are in the habit of seeing black flags, burning
effigies, and slogan-chanting by mobs, why should Salman Rushdie be deprived of
this experience of democracy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment